Disconcerting
Jan 22, 2009
I.
But at the age of eleven he suddenly raised his head and began to speak.
The teachers, male and female, did not always understand the meaning of his questions. “How is it that each thing has a left side and a right side?” That two hands could be at once identical and opposite, when he thought it over, seemed altogether disconcerting. The schoolmistress laughed along with the students. Remouald looked at the floor, his face a deep red.
His favourite subject at the time was geometry; the lessons plunged him into unsettling cogitations. He wished to comprehend why Pythagoras’s theorem, which was explained on the blackboard with numbers and figures that came out of one’s head, applied as well to the wooden frames that held up the roofs of houses, if the textbooks were to be believed. The schoolmaster impatiently repeated the demonstration, which Remouald had very well understood. That is not what he wanted to know. We develop laws in our heads, we create an entire abstract, ideal, mathematical world, and in reality things are in every way like those we have imagined: through what wondrous operation did this come about? The teacher settled the matter by saying it was necessarily so. Remouald left the classroom alarmed by that adverb.
- GaƩtan Soucy. trans Lazer Lederhendler. The Immaculate Conception.
3 Responses to “Disconcerting”
1 sophister Jan 22, 2009
“That two hands could be at once identical and opposite”
This reminded me of something Imam Ghazali said: that the ability to differentiate between two otherwise similar things only lies in God. In other words, if one had the ability to differentiate two absolutely identical spheres, then that One would be God. This doesn’t really relate to your story. Sorry.
2 fathima Jan 22, 2009
actually, it sort of does, but i’ll get into that relation elsewhere.
also, this reminds me that i need to read more Ghazali.
3 sophister Jan 23, 2009
You probably know this already, but for anyone else, that statement by Imam Ghazali is expanded upon in the “Incoherence of the Philosophers.”