Comments on: On the Interwebs: The Medium and the Message http://run.likethewind.ca/2009/interwebs/ a bad idea, followed by poor execution Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:19:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: fathima http://run.likethewind.ca/2009/interwebs/comment-page-1/#comment-9905 fathima Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:11:29 +0000 http://run.likethewind.ca/?p=1290#comment-9905 yeah, calling it 'redundancy' was overstating the overlap. plus, i've had formative conversations i wouldn't have had except for the blog, so the benefit's mutual. yeah, calling it ‘redundancy’ was overstating the overlap.
plus, i’ve had formative conversations i wouldn’t have had except for the blog, so the benefit’s mutual.

]]> By: Restructure! http://run.likethewind.ca/2009/interwebs/comment-page-1/#comment-9903 Restructure! Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:20:15 +0000 http://run.likethewind.ca/?p=1290#comment-9903 There's nothing wrong with redundancy on different media. Different media reach different people. A video may reach people who are less literate, but a transcript of the video may reach people who don't like videos or who are deaf. It's not spamming to cross-post on Facebook, your blog, and The Bullet, especially since these groups mostly do not overlap. Basically, I can't access your Facebook posts, but I would still like to read your political articles. There’s nothing wrong with redundancy on different media. Different media reach different people. A video may reach people who are less literate, but a transcript of the video may reach people who don’t like videos or who are deaf.

It’s not spamming to cross-post on Facebook, your blog, and The Bullet, especially since these groups mostly do not overlap.

Basically, I can’t access your Facebook posts, but I would still like to read your political articles.

]]>